Project 2025's Stance on Pornography and Adult Content
Rationale and Goals
In the foreword to Project 2025's Mandate, Kevin Roberts argues that pornography contributes to societal issues like the sexual exploitation of women, sexual deviance, and the early sexualization of children. He contends that pornography should not be protected under the First Amendment and advocates for its ban, suggesting that it is harmful and addictive, akin to illicit drugs.
Legal Considerations
Historically, the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled in favor of First Amendment protections for adult content, rejecting outright bans on pornography. Project 2025, however, proposes the criminal prosecution of individuals and businesses involved in the production of pornography, a stance that could face significant legal challenges based on free speech rights.
Broadening the Definition of "Pornography"
Journalist Andrew Prokop has noted that Roberts' view of pornography extends beyond conventional adult content. In Project 2025, he links pornography to "transgender ideology" and the "sexualization of children," potentially implying that any content relating to LGBTQ+ topics or gender identity education could be targeted under the Project's proposed restrictions.
Past Commitments and Ongoing Controversies
When Donald Trump accepted the Republican nomination in 2016, he pledged to address the public health impact of online pornography on youth and families. Although he did not fulfill this promise, Project 2025 aims to revisit this commitment. Despite Trump's own alleged affairs with figures from the adult entertainment industry, Roberts has remained supportive, suggesting that personal imperfections do not undermine the validity of the Project's moral aims.
Conclusion
Project 2025's proposals on pornography reflect a broader cultural agenda, seeking both a legal basis to limit adult content and a broader definition of "pornography" that may include diverse aspects of sexuality and gender education. If enacted, these initiatives would challenge long-standing First Amendment protections and could redefine the landscape of adult content and gender expression in the U.S.