Project 2025's Vision for Reshaping Federal Research and Civil Service
Research Driven by Conservative Principles
Project 2025 promotes the idea that taxpayer-funded research should align closely with national interests as defined by conservative values. This initiative suggests significantly reducing federal support for fields like climate science, reflecting the project's skepticism towards mainstream climate research and prioritizing other areas that fit its agenda.
Restructuring Federal Civil Service
Project 2025 seeks a dramatic restructuring of the federal civil service through the reclassification of thousands of federal positions, shifting them from apolitical roles to political appointees. This shift would facilitate the replacement of career civil servants with individuals more closely aligned with conservative ideologies, transforming the civil service into a body that directly supports the president's agenda. The project has even developed a personnel database and screening questionnaire aimed at ensuring ideological adherence among potential appointees.
The Return of Schedule F
Under Schedule F, an initiative from a 2020 executive order, tens of thousands of federal workers could be reassigned as political appointees, which allows the president to bypass traditional civil service protections. Although rescinded in 2021, Project 2025 proposes to reinstate this classification to enable rapid hiring and firing based on political loyalty, fundamentally altering the apolitical nature of the federal workforce.
Expanding American Representation in Federal Contracting
To ensure federal contracts serve American workers, Project 2025 includes a provision to require federal contractors to be at least 70% American citizens, with a goal of increasing this percentage to 95%. This shift emphasizes the project's focus on bolstering American labor within the contracting workforce.
Targeting Civil Servants Opposed to the Agenda
Project Sovereignty 2025, funded by a Heritage Foundation grant, aims to research and publicize the names of high-ranking federal civil servants deemed opposed to the conservative agenda. This initiative has drawn comparisons to the McCarthy-era practice of blacklisting individuals suspected of opposing certain ideologies, raising concerns about fairness and the impact on federal employees.
Concerns from Experts
While some experts agree that federal bureaucracy may need reform, others argue that the changes proposed under Project 2025 would destabilize government functionality. Political scientist Francis Fukuyama, among others, warns that Schedule F and the shift towards politically loyal civil servants could "dangerously undermine" the efficiency and objectivity of the federal government.
Conclusion
Project 2025's proposals would introduce a highly partisan direction to both federally funded research and the composition of the civil service. By aligning taxpayer-funded research with conservative principles, reclassifying civil servants, and establishing screening mechanisms, the project represents a significant shift in the relationship between government and public administration.